CSR and A woman: Potential Applicants’ Expectations Of CSR And Gender Differences

Aleksandra Zaleśna

Abstract


Companies are increasingly paying attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR) as they expect it to affect their attractiveness as an employer. However, the question is whether prospective applicants expect social responsiveness from a future employer, and how gender differences affect those expectations. The purpose of this study was to identify expectations that potential applicants have of CSR from a prospective employer, and how gender differences affect applicants’ expectations. Using a sample of 153 business students, the study reveals that gender differences matter. The results demonstrate higher CSR expectations of a prospective employer among women. The results are statistically important for such CSR aspects as: fair employee evaluation process, support for additional education, full information to customers, contributions to charities, and treatment of the environment. Additionally, the findings reveal the proportion of women to men expecting a total CSR from a prospective employer, and this proportion is 5:1.


Keywords


corporate social responsibility; woman; gender differences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 314-332.

Albinger. H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243-253.

Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business and Society, 41(3), 292-318.

Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.

Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.

Campbell, J. L., (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

Cheah, E.-T., Jamali, D., Johnson, J. E. V., & Sung, M.-C. (2011). Drivers of corporate social responsibility attitudes: The demography of socially responsible investors. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 305-323.

Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19-33.

Dӧgl, C., & Holtbrügge, D. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility, employer reputation and employee commitment: an empirical study in developed and emerging economies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1739-1762.

Etheredge, J. M. (1999). The perceived role of ethics and corporate social responsibility: An alternative scale structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 51-64.

Fatoki, O. (2016). Gender and the perception of corporate social responsibility by university students in South Africa. Gender & Behaviour, 14 (3), 7574-7588.

Fiedor, B. (2016). Implementacja koncepcji CSR jako przesłanka trwałości firmy i jej sukcesu rynkowego. Przegląd Organizacji, 1, 23-28.

Fitzpatrick, J. (2013). Business students’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility. College Student Journal, 47(1), 86-95.

Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu. (2015). Menedżerowie CSR. Wyniki badania. Retrieved from http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Menedzerowie-CSR_raport_podglad.pdf.

Glavas, A., & Kelley, K. (2014). The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165-202.

Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383-404.

Kahreh, M. S., Babania, A., Tive, M., & Mirmehdi, S. M. (2014). An examination to effects of gender differences on the corporate social responsibility (CSR). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 664-668.

Kim, S., & Park, H. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 639-653.

Landry, E. E., Bernardi, R. A., & Bosco, S. M. (2016). Recognition for sustained corporate social responsibility: Female directors make a difference. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(1), 27-36.

Lis, B. (2012). The relevance of corporate social responsibility for a sustainable human resource management: An analysis of organizational attractiveness as a determinant in employees’ selection of a (potential) employer. Management Revue, 23(3), 279-295.

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: the case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283-297.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.

Rodrigo, P., Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes, Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265-283.

Setó-Pamies, D. (2015). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334-345.

Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: a scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1131-1140.

Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127 (3), 537-548.

Strand, R. (2013) The Chief Officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112 (4), 721-734.

Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.

Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189-204.

Wiengarten, F., Lo, C. K. Y., Lam, J. Y. K. (2017). How does sustainability leadership affect firm performance? The choices associated with appointing a Chief Officer of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 477-493.

Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1-10.

Woźniak, J. (2017). Wpływ informacji o działaniach CSR firmy na decyzje jej potencjalnych pracowników różnej płci. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 1, 118-134.

Woźniak, J. (2016). Informacje o działaniach CSR i innych korzyściach symbolicznych jako narzędzie zwiększania atrakcyjności pracodawcy w oczach kandydatów różnej płci. Zeszyty Naukowe WSES w Ostrołęce, 4 (23), 32-49.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.19197/tbr.v16i3.128

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Print ISSN: 1643-8175 (2451-0947), Online ISSN: 2451-0955, DOI prefix: 10.19197, Principal Contact: tbr@wsb.torun.pl